Back
 in the dim and distant past, and I was a young and slimmer district 
reporter, Stonehaven Court was my home of a Tuesday.  Sometimes on a 
Thursday too, but always on a Tuesday.
There
 was a set pattern - one you could set your clocks by.  In fact I 
suspect the sitting Sheriff in my time there, the venerable but 
occasionally cheeky Sandy Jessop, often did.
10am
 starts every day.  Mondays would be custody hearings for weekend 
arrests.  Tuesday was criminal cases before the Sheriff.  Tuesday 
afternoon would be overspill from the morning, or Sheriff trials if it 
was a light day.  Wednesday was civil court.  Thursday was a day of 
Sheriff trials again.  Friday was district court.
Invariably
 it’d be me and Crawford, the old hand from the Mearns Leader, sat on 
the press bench.  Occasionally we might be joined by Gary Cooper from 
the Courier if something from the Angus border was sitting.  
Occasionally, if Ken or Susan from Northscot agency joined us, it meant 
something tasty was scheduled for the day.
There’s
 a pattern, a routine to covering court for any length of time, 
particularly in a smaller local community.  You get on nodding, then 
chatting, terms with all the solicitors, and the local bobby assigned to
 the courtroom.  
If
 you’re good, or lucky, you build a relationship with the PF’s office to
 be aware of what’s coming up - although Stonehaven’s PF at the time, a 
grumbling James Robertson Justice lookalike called Barbour, notoriously 
hated the paper, and seemed to go of his way to be difficult.
And
 you start to identify patterns in the court lists.  Names from out of 
town tend to be motoring offences - truckers done for tachograph 
violations, or drivers caught out by the A90’s notorious run of speed 
cameras.  Local addresses were likely breach of the peace or similar offences .  If there was someone in fatigues in the public benches, it 
meant a squaddie from Balmoral or 45 Commando was up.
You
 get to recognise names from repeat offenders - always a tricky one, 
because it builds up in your mind what they’ve done before.  
Occasionally you see folk you know: an old school classmate of mine was 
up for breaking the peace after a post-pub rammy in a car park.  The 
walk of shame out of court took him past my seat in press row. 
 His face was a picture.
Trials
 were always a sod.  A good trial could take up a full day, possibly 
more, and in a one-man office that could be costly.  Was the day-long 
trial of drunken girl flashing her knickers and dryhumping passers-by a 
good enough page lead to sacrifice covering a major planning hearing in 
Aboyne?  At what point do you nip out to phone the desk and summon a 
snapper without missing something good?  Reporting became a balancing 
act.
You
 got the occasional plea - ‘please don’t write this in the paper, it’ll 
cost me my job’ - and faced the occasional threat - ‘write this in the 
paper and I’ll break your arms’.  Had both of those.  Even had the 
defendant come into my office in the town square and menace me during a 
week-long assault trial - bit of a giveaway over his guilt, that one.
But the whole of human life was also there, write large on the faces of those in court.
Grumbling,
 wizened old hacks tend to moan about court reporting being a lost art, 
but in many ways it’s true.  News cutbacks even on a regional level 
means many good tales are lost or overlooked by papers and broadcasters 
in favour.  People want big stories and big name trials.  
But
 court reporting - and all that comes with it - is the bread and butter 
of local journalism, a fact that should never be lost.
Iain M Hepburn's blog can be found here: [The Drum]
Copyright remains with the author.
Copyright remains with the author.
No comments:
Post a Comment