By Cristiana Theodoli, @_cric_
On
the first day of Open Justice Week we received the disappointing news
that we will be not allowed to live tweet a full Scottish trial.
Our
colleagues south of the border can now tweet from any trial or court
case without having to ask for permission here in Scotland there are
no such guidelines and journalists have to apply directly to a
trial's judge if they want to use social media to report.
Yet
while a good few have applied, not one single journalist has been
given permission to tweet a full trial so far.
STV
broke new ground up here when they were given permission to tweet
Tommy Sheridan's sentencing over a year ago in January 2011 but the
issue of tweeting from Scottish courts does not seem to have moved
any further forward since.
The
biggest obstacle for those trying to give a live account of a
Scottish court case is time.
We
first started our discussions with the judiciary office a month ago
before identifying a specific trial we felt was appropriate to live
tweet three weeks ago.
I
picked that specific trial as it was the most suited out of those due
to start this week. The criteria included type of offence, locus of
offence, number of accused and the exact charges.
I
will not go into too many details as I could write a whole article
about the decision process, but, for instance, I decided not to apply
to any case that included alleged sexual offences, while it is just
as important for those cases to be covered by us journalists I do
feel that there are some aspects of the evidence coming out in these
types of cases that is better to keep private out of respect for the
victims.
I
also felt as this would have been the first full case to be tweeted
we should ensure it would not be one likely to cause confusion when
followed live online due to too many charges or too many accused.
In
future once tweeting from court is something we will all be
accustomed to these won't be issues but as a first in Scotland I
felt we should be particularly careful.
At
that time, on February 8, we were told the application could not go
any further as a Judge had not been assigned to the trial.
The
cases due to start this week were finally assigned to their
respective Judges at the start of last week at which point we asked
for the application to be again considered.
Today,
just a day or two before the trial is due to start, we received a
short email stating that the Judge has a number of concerns that he
feels should be taken up at a senior level and the timescale would
not allow for it.
The
Head of Judicial Communications in Scotland, Elizabeth Cutting, who
herself has been of great help throughout the application process,
said that eventually guidelines will be put in place but, at the
moment, they are still working to ensure those are as comprehensive
as possible.
To
be clear we are not disappointed at the people involved, we accept in
Scotland there has not been a single application to tweet from court
during live proceedings granted and that judges want to ensure they look at all
aspects.
Yet
we do wish the system would allow for more dialogue between those
who, like us, are working to ensure the system remains transparent
and accountable, and those who ensure due process is followed.
Cristiana Theodoli's blog can be found here: [Wordpress]
Copyright remains with the author.
Copyright remains with the author.
Bad luck. It's worth noting that LCJ's guidance for England & Wales does make a distinction between journalists/legal commentators and members of the public, which opens up an interesting point for debate:
ReplyDelete"The new guidance makes clear that there is no longer any need for representatives of the media/legal commentators to make an application to use text-based devices to communicate from court. Members of the public should make a formal or informal application if they wish to use these devices. Use of devices should not cause a disturbance or distraction."
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications-and-reports/guidance/2011/courtreporting